<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Steam gets me sheepish</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.demodulated.com/2007/04/21/steam-gets-me-sheepish/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.demodulated.com/2007/04/21/steam-gets-me-sheepish/</link>
	<description>the analog feed demodulated</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 12:39:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://blog.demodulated.com/2007/04/21/steam-gets-me-sheepish/comment-page-1/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.demodulated.com/2007/04/21/steam-gets-me-sheepish/#comment-277</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the sound advice.  I like this concept.  I&#039;m going to investigate whether there are any fees coupled with this concept and will probably go for it.  Sounds like precisely the thing I need.

But was I really worked up over nothing?  I see Valve&#039;s reluctance to make a public statement as a means of disassociating themselves with any bad press.  This might be okay if people&#039;s private billing information wasn&#039;t at stake.  A company as high-profile as Valve is probably going to get hacked a few times.  They should have been more prepared for the investigation and especially the flood of scared customers clamouring to know whether their very identities are at risk.  I just see this fiasco as an opportunity for Valve to show the world how they handle customer support issues.  This was a freebie for Valve because all people wanted was assurance that they are aware of the issue and are actively engaged in it.  This is customer service 101 here - an automated telephone message tells you this when your call is put on hold - but Valve couldn&#039;t be bothered.  Valve failed.

I&#039;m relieved that there turned out to be no danger to me personally, but it sounds like (as it is STILL unconfirmed by Valve) there was a weak link in the chain that allowed this malicious individual to obtain records about cyber cafes.  Why is Valve neglecting security in some aspects of its billing systems?  Cyber Cafes are Valve&#039;s regular source of income - their bulk purchasers.  I saw in a leaked screenshot that a little cafe in my province was cut off for having a delinquent account.  That&#039;s probably enough information for me to call them up, posing as Valve, and have them write me a cheque.

Anyway, bad taste in my mouth overall.  Unimpressive disaster planning procedures at Valve.  That&#039;s not a quality I admire in any retailer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the sound advice.  I like this concept.  I&#8217;m going to investigate whether there are any fees coupled with this concept and will probably go for it.  Sounds like precisely the thing I need.</p>
<p>But was I really worked up over nothing?  I see Valve&#8217;s reluctance to make a public statement as a means of disassociating themselves with any bad press.  This might be okay if people&#8217;s private billing information wasn&#8217;t at stake.  A company as high-profile as Valve is probably going to get hacked a few times.  They should have been more prepared for the investigation and especially the flood of scared customers clamouring to know whether their very identities are at risk.  I just see this fiasco as an opportunity for Valve to show the world how they handle customer support issues.  This was a freebie for Valve because all people wanted was assurance that they are aware of the issue and are actively engaged in it.  This is customer service 101 here &#8211; an automated telephone message tells you this when your call is put on hold &#8211; but Valve couldn&#8217;t be bothered.  Valve failed.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m relieved that there turned out to be no danger to me personally, but it sounds like (as it is STILL unconfirmed by Valve) there was a weak link in the chain that allowed this malicious individual to obtain records about cyber cafes.  Why is Valve neglecting security in some aspects of its billing systems?  Cyber Cafes are Valve&#8217;s regular source of income &#8211; their bulk purchasers.  I saw in a leaked screenshot that a little cafe in my province was cut off for having a delinquent account.  That&#8217;s probably enough information for me to call them up, posing as Valve, and have them write me a cheque.</p>
<p>Anyway, bad taste in my mouth overall.  Unimpressive disaster planning procedures at Valve.  That&#8217;s not a quality I admire in any retailer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mick</title>
		<link>http://blog.demodulated.com/2007/04/21/steam-gets-me-sheepish/comment-page-1/#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator>mick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 22:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.demodulated.com/2007/04/21/steam-gets-me-sheepish/#comment-275</guid>
		<description>*the only TIME when*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*the only TIME when*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mick</title>
		<link>http://blog.demodulated.com/2007/04/21/steam-gets-me-sheepish/comment-page-1/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>mick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 22:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.demodulated.com/2007/04/21/steam-gets-me-sheepish/#comment-274</guid>
		<description>well, that&#039;s good to hear,
see, got yourself all worked up for nothing :)
but yeah, like i said, i have such peace of mind when making online purchases because I only ever use a (visa) &quot;multi-access&quot; debit card , which is linked to two of my bank accounts, one of which functions as a credit/debit card, (the other is my regular check/savings account) which for most of the time, I leave a balance of $0 in - that means $0 can be taken out.
then the only when *i* am the one making a purchase, i simply log into my bank and  &quot;top up&quot; the debit account by transferring (instantly) only the necessary amount from my main account.
I have a schedule for regular monthly things like phone bills &amp; internet etc. so the money is only ever in there briefly.
so I never need worry about someone knowing my card details because they will just get a &quot;declined&quot; if they try to do something silly ^_^ hehehe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, that&#8217;s good to hear,<br />
see, got yourself all worked up for nothing :)<br />
but yeah, like i said, i have such peace of mind when making online purchases because I only ever use a (visa) &#8220;multi-access&#8221; debit card , which is linked to two of my bank accounts, one of which functions as a credit/debit card, (the other is my regular check/savings account) which for most of the time, I leave a balance of $0 in &#8211; that means $0 can be taken out.<br />
then the only when *i* am the one making a purchase, i simply log into my bank and  &#8220;top up&#8221; the debit account by transferring (instantly) only the necessary amount from my main account.<br />
I have a schedule for regular monthly things like phone bills &amp; internet etc. so the money is only ever in there briefly.<br />
so I never need worry about someone knowing my card details because they will just get a &#8220;declined&#8221; if they try to do something silly ^_^ hehehe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
